Skip to content
SearchCub

Write an Article Pitch With a Reporting Plan

Editorial responsibility: SearchCub

Write an article pitch that separates what you can already show from what you still propose to report. Give the editor a precise reader, angle and example, then explain the unanswered questions and how you would seek the answers. A possible article is not a finished article, and a proposed approach is not a source response.

This complete exercise uses an invented newsletter, Northbank Notes. Its editor, notices and organizer are fictional. The pitch below is copy to adapt, not a sent message or an accepted assignment.

Start With the Complete Editor Request

The fictional editor's prompt is:

Propose a practical article for volunteer editors who turn submitted community notices into newsletter listings. Show how to separate a complete supplied listing from fields that still need a source. Supply the proposed reporting plan before asking me to assign the piece. No article has been assigned and no delivery date or fee has been agreed.

That request gives the intended reader and the work the proposal should explain. It does not supply a delivery date or a fee. Put the bounded purpose in your article brief, while keeping the pitch focused on the editor's decision about whether to assign the work.

Read the Supplied Material Before Promising Reporting

Notice N1: Supplied Date, Time and Place

The complete original notice reads:

Paper-zine swap: Friday 16 October 2026, 18:00–19:30, Cedar Room. Bring a zine if you wish.

N1 supplies the activity, calendar date, start and end times, and Cedar Room. Bringing a zine is optional. The price and entry conditions are not supplied, so complete date/time/place does not mean every possible event field is known.

Notice N2: Unanswered Fields

The complete original notice reads:

Sketch evening in Cedar. Bring a notebook if you wish.

N2 supplies the activity, the word Cedar and an optional notebook. Its date, start time and end time are unknown; the precise venue is also unresolved because this notice does not say whether Cedar means the room in N1. Its price and entry conditions are unknown too.

The exercise's complete access record is:

The exercise supplies a fictional organizer contact route for N2 through the newsletter editor. No message has been sent; no organizer response, consent, availability or answer is supplied.

That route makes an approach possible to propose. It does not establish that the organizer is available, has agreed to an interview or has answered any question.

Use the Complete Filled Pitch

The following is proposed pitch wording for this fictional exercise. Keep its parts together when adapting it: the example, reporting plan and limits qualify the same article idea.

Working Title

Turn a Submitted Notice Into a Checkable Listing

Reader and Angle

For Northbank Notes' declared volunteer-editor audience, I propose a practical guide to turning a submitted notice into a listing while keeping unanswered fields visible. The angle is the decision between copyable supplied details and questions that still need the organizer; it is not a claim that this newsletter's readers have been surveyed.

Material in Hand

The supplied Paper-zine swap notice gives Friday 16 October 2026, 18:00–19:30, Cedar Room, and an optional zine. I can use it as a labelled fictional complete-date/time/place example. It supplies no price or entry conditions. The Sketch evening notice gives the activity, the word Cedar and an optional notebook, but no date or time; it does not establish that Cedar means Cedar Room.

Planned Article

The proposed article will first show N1's supplied date/time/place fields, then work through N2's unanswered date, time and precise venue. It will finish with a short listing assembled only from verified answers if those answers arrive; otherwise the demonstration will retain explicit unanswered fields and explain why it is not a complete publishable event listing.

No date, price or entry condition will be copied from N1 into N2.

Proposed Reporting

Through the editor's supplied fictional contact route, I propose asking N2's organizer for the event's calendar date, start and end times, the precise venue meant by Cedar, price and entry conditions, and whether the response may be used in the article. I would retain the actual response and distinguish its supplied details from my explanation.

No contact or reply is represented as completed.

Limits

This pitch contains invented teaching notices, not a reported community event. It does not establish demand, a confirmed interview, an accepted commission, agreed fee or delivery date. It cannot yet promise a complete N2 listing.

Editor Decision Requested

Please decide whether this bounded angle and fictional demonstration fit the intended article, whether the proposed organizer approach is appropriate, and what scope, delivery terms and deadline you would require before agreeing on an assignment. This is proposed pitch wording, not a message sent to an editor.

Check the Status of Each Promise

Already supplied: Friday 16 October 2026; 18:00–19:30; Cedar Room. Those values belong to N1. Copying them into N2 would create an answer the second notice never gave.

Proposed reporting: N2's calendar date, start and end times, and precise venue need an organizer answer. Keep each question visible rather than using a vague promise to “find out more.” Price and entry conditions remain unsupplied for both notices.

No agreement recorded: A pitch being sent, accepted or paid for is not established. Neither an interview appointment nor a publication date follows from the proposed plan. The editor decision is requested in the wording, not recorded as an outcome.

For your own proposal, use the same distinction: name the material you actually have, the questions you would ask and the access you actually have. A plan can be specific without inventing an answer or a calendar commitment.

If the Contact Route Is Missing, Change the Plan

In the changed exercise, no organizer access card is supplied. The organizer approach is a proposed reporting need with no available contact route in this changed packet. Ask the editor for an appropriate actual access route before promising or scheduling contact; do not carry the original exercise's route into this variant.

The notice analysis still stands, but “I will interview the organizer” would promise access that this changed record does not provide. Replace that promise with the need to obtain an appropriate route; do not borrow the route from the earlier version.

Use the blogger's topic-planning guide to connect the angle to a useful article idea. Once the work is actually assigned and the required material is available, the blog-post writing guide can help you develop the article itself.